FEATURED TALK
|
Art, Violence, & Literature in the United States
|
Russ Castronovo
|
| |
PHASE I |
1. Common Sense and Revolution
|
Russ Castronovo
|
2. Literature and the
Art of Social Government
|
Russ Castronovo
|
3. Lynching and Aesthetics
|
Russ Castronovo
|
4. Anarchy, Internationalism,
and American Literature
|
Russ Castronovo
|
5. Globalization and
American Literature
|
Russ Castronovo
|
6. Racial Interstitiality and the Jim
Crow Era
|
Leslie Bow
|
| |
PHASE II
|
1. U.S. Writers in Oceania
|
Paul Lyons
|
2. The Contest for Hearts and Minds:
Will the Political Center Hold in American Politics?
|
Deane Neubauer
|
 |
| |
Art, Violence,
& Literature in the United States
by Russ Castronovo
Defined as a specialized discourse about
art and beauty as well as the general processes through
which people as collective beings respond to sensation
and form judgments, aesthetics occupy a zone of division
and uncertainty. Such elusiveness has been and continues
to be prime territory for conflicting agendas in the United
States and its literary history. This forum probes the
interconnections among aesthetics, violence, and literature.
By looking at political writings from the American Revolutionary
era, slave narratives of the antebellum period, realist
fiction of the early 1900s, and poetry of the Harlem Renaissance,
we will explore literature’s role in shaping civic
behavior and democratic consciousness. Thomas Jefferson,
Thomas Paine, Phyllis Wheatley, Harriet Jacobs, Frederick
Douglass, Stephen Crane, Jacob Riis, Langston Hughes, Jessie
Fauset, Claude McKay, and W.E.B. Du Bois are among the
writers we will examine.
TOP
|
PHASE I
|
|
1. Common Sense and Revolution
by Russ Castronovo
In 1776, Thomas Jefferson and his rebel compatriots
famously declared, “We hold these truths to be self evident….” This
statement presents revolution as an obvious fact that every person
can perceive and understand immediately. Tom Paine gave fuller expression
to this sentiment in his pamphlet, Common Sense, which, through a
mixture of logic and sentiment, stirred support for American independence.
This session probes the link between such demonstrations of “common
sense” and revolutionary consciousness. It is a link that takes
us to the ground of aesthetic judgment, a zone of feeling and supposedly
universal sensibility. But civic feelings can become overexcited
and popular sensibilities can become inflamed. The result is mob
rule, what Paine called the “popular rage.” How did American
revolutionaries—and how can we—distinguish between popular
democracy and “popular rage,” between the rule of the
people and the rule of the mob? In addition to turning to Jefferson
and Paine as we seek answers to these questions, we will also consider
Hannah Foster’s epistolary novel of 1797, The Coquette, and
Hawthorne’s short story published in 1832, “My Kinsman,
Major Molineux.”
TOP
|
2.
Literature and the Art of Social Government
by Russ Castronovo
“I have seen an armful of daisies keep the peace
of a block better than a policeman and his club,” wrote the pioneering
urban reformer and photographer Jacob Riis. His statement connects tenement
reform to the deployment of aesthetic resources, suggesting that we might
well wonder about the ways in which American literature has been charged
with a moral mission. Slum novels, documentary photography, and reports
from charities such as the Flower Mission reveal that Riis was not alone
in the belief that beauty could turn the urban herd into disciplined
citizens. This faith found its theoretical complement in academic research,
much of it disseminated through the university extension movement, which
argued for the existence of a species-wide “art instinct” that
strives for harmony and perfection. At the same time, though, reformers
observed that magic lantern shows created unruly crowds, flowers bedecked
prostitutes, and nickelodeons encouraged larceny. This session examines
the transformative powers of aesthetics that create law-abiding citizens
as well as lawbreakers. Jacob Riis, Stephen Crane, Harriet Beecher Stowe,
and John Dewey will inform our conversation.
TOP
|
3. Lynching
and Aesthetics
by Russ Castronovo
The ritualistic and spectacular nature of lynching
reveals the murderous dimensions of aesthetics. Many whites looked on
the killing of a black person as public entertainment and tourist spectacle.
Photographs often commemorated the grisly event. Against this aestheticization
of violence, black writers and intellectuals sought to combat injustice
by turning beauty into a zone of political combat. For W.E.B. Du Bois,
this strategy famously entailed the conflation of art and propaganda.
While African American poets of the Harlem Renaissance such as Langston
Hughes and Claude McKay rejected Du Bois’s formula for political
art, they nonetheless made lynching and racial violence a poetic subject.
This tension feeds into a larger debate about the political uses of art:
when does art cease being art and when does it become propaganda?
TOP
|
4.
Anarchy, Internationalism, and American Literature
by Russ Castronovo
At the end of A Hazard of New Fortunes, the character
Basil March doubts that “something cataclysmal” can produce
social “change.” But the author of Hazard, William Dean
Howells, along with his contemporaries, wondered whether the everyday
stuff of culture packed the charge of social reform. Howells’s
literary criticism, especially when considered in light of contemporary
socialist texts and the Haymarket Bombing, suggests that ordinary
artifacts and common speech are laden with revolutionary potential.
Looking at anarchist “how-to” manuals on bomb making
and works on international socialism published in the U.S., this
session explores how foreign ideas about strikes and social change
lost their strangeness to become part of the familiar landscape of
U.S. cultural discourse. We will examine the circulation of Karl
Marx’s ideas in the United States, Walt Whitman’s poetic
visions of the French Commune, and Howells’s visions of striking
workers; in short, we will explore the international dimensions of
nineteenth-century American literature. These dimensions often involve
terrorism, suggesting a point of comparison to U.S. responses to
terrorism in the twenty-first century.
TOP
|
5. Globalization
and American Literature
by Russ Castronovo
This session asks: What role does American Studies
play in globalization? Since the 1960s critics of American higher education
have acknowledged the ties between college curricula (especially the
teaching of literature) and the nation-state. But in the wake of the
so-called demise of the nation-state, universities and colleges have
now set about educating students as citizens of a global economy. This
session investigates the potential effects of this new global citizenship,
particularly its dominant versions produced in American universities.
But there is also the risk of seeing globalization as a wholly recent
phenomenon. We will put into context global formations occurring now
at the start of the twenty-first century by looking at American writers
of the late-19th century, such as Walt Whitman and Frank Norris. We will
pay special attention to U.S. military, economic, and literary interests
in Asia and the Pacific Rim in the 1890s and early 1900s. Given the perspective
provided by this dual historical focus on past and present, what does
it mean to speak of “America” as opposed to “the United
States”?
TOP
|
6. Racial
Interstitiality and the Jim Crow Era
by Leslie Bow
This seminar explores race relations in the U.S.
by casting a new lens on the Jim Crow era in the American South.
In focusing on the schematic imposed by segregation, we will look
at those individuals and communities who came to represent a third
caste within a caste system predicated on the distinction between “colored” and “white.” In
exploring the ways in which Asians, Latinos, and Indians became understood
within the racial logic of the South, we will investigate the making
of social status within literature, sociology, history, and personal
narrative. In analyzing how color lines became drawn and what racial
identity segregation demanded of those who seemed to stand outside—or
rather, between—its structural logics, we will explore the
ways in which status arises out of multiple and intersecting axes
of differentiation: concepts of class, foreignness, sexuality, and
gender in addition to race. In looking at “other colored people,” what
appears to be unaccommodated within a system of relations may serve
to unveil the structures and interests that support it. Thus, we
will situate these racially interstitial populations not as aberrations
to Jim Crow, but as productive sites for understanding white supremacy
and its investments.
TOP
|
PHASE II
|
1. U.S.
Writers in Oceania
by Paul Lyons
This talk considers the imaginative responses of U.S.
writers to the peoples of Oceania from the time of early explorers through
the present. This talk will highlight in particular the ways in which
the works of Richard Henry Dana, Herman Melville, Mark Twain, Jack London,
Charles Warren Stoddard, and Willowdean Handy represented Island cultures
and intercultural exchange, and commented on U.S. politics in the region.
Dr. Lyons will also briefly look at interactions and collaborations between
Natives and U.S. settlers.
TOP
|
2. The
Contest for Hearts and Minds: Will the Political Center Hold
in American
Politics?
by Deane Neubauer
"American politics is often characterized within
the United States in terms of a politics of 'right' and 'left'. Yet from
outside the United States its politics does not seem to embody the extremes
of other countries. In this lecture we will explore the historical meaning
of left, right, and center in American politics in the light of recent
elections. In particular we will discuss the challenges of maintaining
a "politics of the center."
TOP
|